11–16 May 2014
Casino Conference Centre
Europe/Prague timezone

Accelerator mass spectrometry of uranium: comparison of U<sub>3</sub>O<sub>8</sub> and UF<sub>4</sub> target matrices

12 May 2014, 17:15
1h 30m
Casino Conference Centre

Casino Conference Centre

Reitenbergerova 4/95, Mari&#225;nsk&#233; L&#225;zn&#283;, Czech Republic <font color=white>
Poster Nuclear Analytical Methods Poster Session - Nuclear Analytical Methods

Speaker

Irena Špendlíková (Department of Nuclear Chemistry, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University, 115 19 Prague, Czech Republic)

Description

For determination of 236U/238U ratios in environmental samples by accelerator mass spectrometry, the U3O8 targets are usually used for the UO- beam production. Uranium fluoride targets containing no oxygen and hydrogen may offer higher molecular isobar suppression together with a higher accuracy and sensitivity of uranium isotope analysis1. However, the preparation of anhydrous UF4 targets is more complicated than the preparation of U3O8 targets. When introducing inert atmosphere into the dehydration step of the preparation the only partial reduction of oxygen and hydrogen content in the final product of the preparation method was assured. In this work, several U3O8 and UF4 targets were tested in the CENTA laboratory using the MC-SNICS ion source and double focusing injection magnet and the targets were prepared using the Vienna KKU standard with 236U/238U isotopic ratio of 10-11. The detailed study of anhydrous UF4 preparation method will be performed in CTU laboratories. The ion current from only one UF2- sample was in average higher by about 50 % than the UO- current from the U3O8 samples. The targets were completely sputtered away, and the estimated ionization yields of UO- and UF2- were of the order of 10-3. However, with the improved procedure of the UF4 targets production, we expect that even higher ionization yields could be obtained. REFERENCES 1. Wang X.: Nucl. Technol., 2013(182), 235.

Primary author

Irena Špendlíková (Department of Nuclear Chemistry, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University, 115 19 Prague, Czech Republic)

Co-authors

Miroslav Ješkovský (CENTA Laboratory, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University, 84248 Bratislava, Slovakia) Mojmír Němec (Department of Nuclear Chemistry, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University, 115 19 Prague, Czech Republic) Pavel P Povinec (CENTA Laboratory, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University, 84248 Bratislava, Slovakia) Peter Steier (VERA Laboratory, Faculty of Physics, Universität Wien, 1090 Vienna, Austria) Robert Breier (CENTA Laboratory, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University, 84248 Bratislava, Slovakia)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.